“D.C.’s total population now stands at 646,449—a figure not seen since the 1970s”

by Prince Of Petworth December 31, 2013 at 11:00 am 27 Comments

Photo by PoPville flickr user wolfpackWX

From the Mayor’s office:

“Mayor Vincent C. Gray today welcomed the latest estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau showing that the District’s population continued its rapid growth between July 2012 and July 2013, adding 13,022 residents and keeping D.C. among the list of fastest-growing areas in the country.

This means D.C.’s total population now stands at 646,449—a figure not seen since the 1970s. The District grew by 2.0 percent over the year, or by an average of 1,085 new residents per month. (Note: The previous 2012 population estimate of 632,323 has been revised upward to 633,427). This number means that the city has grown on average by 1,146 new residents per month between April 1, 2010 (when the 2010 Census count closed) and July 1, 2013. This continued trend of growth moves the District closer to its Sustainable DC goal of increasing the city’s population by 250,000 residents within the next twenty years.

“The new population estimate demonstrates that the District continues to be one of the most attractive and competitive cities in the nation,” said Mayor Gray. “I set a goal for this city to be healthiest, greenest, and most livable city in the country within 20 years. These results tell us that people across the nation and around the world already see us as well on our way.”

For the third year in a row, the District remained among the nation’s fastest-growing states by percent, outpacing even rapidly growing Sun Belt states such as Texas. The data shows that all age groups and all generations (youths, millennials and boomers) are participating in the city’s renaissance.

“This continued growth is an endorsement of the livability of our dynamic city and a literal return on the investment that we have made in improved city services, transportation choices, public safety, education quality, school facilities, parks, libraries and in the quality and convenience of our many neighborhoods,” said Harriet Tregoning, Director of the DC Office of Planning, which oversees the District’s State Data Center and Census activities.

New Residents, Increase in Births

According to the Census Bureau’s data, this tremendous growth can be attributed to an influx of new residents from other states and abroad and increasing births to District residents. With over 9,000 births each year since 2008, the District’s baby boom continues – bucking a trend that has seen birth rates decline in much of the rest of the nation. Data for the District show 9,589 births and 5,151 deaths from July 1, 2012 to July 1, 2013. In addition to this gain of 4,438 residents from natural increase (births minus deaths), migration has resulted in 8,584 net new residents to the District from other states and abroad. The District continues to make gains in domestic migration with 6,319 more people moving into the city from other states than moved out.


People are continuing to choose the Washington area to call home because of several factors. While other areas of the nation are emerging from the economic downturn and begun adding jobs, there are greater opportunities for finding a job in the Washington region. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), from July 2012 to July 2013, the Washington region added 32,800 jobs of which 13.4 percent were added in the District. From the height of the recession in 2009 to the present, the region’s unemployment rate dropped from 6.5 percent to 5.3 percent. During the same period, the District’s unemployment rate dropped from a high of 10.5 percent to 8.6. The launch of the District’s Five-Year Economic Development Strategy in November 2012, with the goal of growing and diversifying the District’s economy while also preparing the workforce for new employment opportunities, is already bearing fruit. Efforts implemented under the strategy have already yielded 17,500 new jobs.


The District’s significant investments to improve public education and offer high-quality school facilities are another factor attracting new residents and retaining families. The District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) showed the greatest growth among all urban school districts in the nation on its 2013 Trial Urban District Assessment. The growth in DCPS students’ 4th and 8th grade math and reading scores represented the highest scores ever seen on this test for DCPS. DCPS’ ranking among other urban school districts also jumped significantly this year, moving from last on this test in 2007 to having nine districts behind DCPS in 2013. Additionally, the growth in DCPS students’ scores equaled or exceeded growth of the District’s public charter school students.


The Census Bureau numbers continue to reflect the demand for housing in the District. According to Delta Associates, new rental buildings in Shaw, Downtown, NoMa and along South Capitol Street by Nationals Stadium leased up at some of the fastest rates in the region. The condominium market is seeing similar activity. The Greater Capital Area Association of Realtors reports that year-over-year condominium sales through November are up over 17 percent each year for two years in a row.


Local investments in public infrastructure are paying off. The District’s investments are providing more transportation choices – including car, bike sharing, rapid bus service and streetcar lines – while residents are better utilizing public transportation and walking to work. According to census data, between 2000 and 2012, for workers 16 years and older, the percentage of people who use public transportation for commuting increased from 33.2 percent to 38.6 percent. Over the 2000 to 2012 period, while the District’s population increased by 10.7 percent, the percentage of households with no vehicles available increased from 36.9 percent to 37.9 percent, meaning more people and households but fewer households with cars.


Another important factor making the District a safe and attractive place to live and work is the significant decline in homicides. According to the Metropolitan Police Department’s 2012 Annual Report, the District saw its lowest number of annual homicides in almost half a century with 88 murders. Although the number of homicides in 2013 is on track to bypass the 2012 number, mainly due to the Navy Yard shooting, homicides in the District has declined significantly over the past 3 years.

In general, the upward trend in the District’s population is expected to continue since the District abounds in attractions. The District’s investments in public infrastructure, transportation choices, parks, public schools, libraries, retail establishments, and abundant choices for leisure and entertainment are some of the factors yielding high returns.”

  • Anonymous

    Between 2000-2010, DC surpassed Vermont and widened still its population lead over Wyoming.

  • Anonymous Coward

    And still treated as sub-human by Congress. DC really needs to get its representation or they need to 0 out federal earned income taxes (keep the taxes on the unearned portion, I’m a man of the people).

  • Anonymous

    My prediction: we get 1 Senator once DC’s population hits 1 million. Perhaps before I die.

    • Anonymous Coward

      Only if the city is majority white by then. The southern gentlemen in the GOP enjoy having power of the last plantation. I know it’s not a PC thing to say but it’s true.

    • 17th St

      My Prediction: Never just one senator. Two might be possible, if the moon and the stars align just right, but one would throw off the balance in the Senate and essentially eliminate the Vice President’s ability to vote to break tied Senate votes. The VP doesn’t get to wield that power very often, but since it’s one of the few things the position actually does, I can’t see it being given away.

  • Anonymous

    so, tell me again why Vincent Gray is a bad mayor?

    • Anonymous

      He has nothing to do with this. Any mayor would look good with the budget DC has.. The good work here started under Mayor Anthony Williams–he deserves the credit.

      • Anonymous

        The ones who really deserve credit are the Bush Administration. The War on Terror™ funded the massive boom in DC and brought legions of well paid professionals into the city proper. The Financial Crisis then brought even more, as DC was the only major metro area in the country that was experiencing net job growth.
        The mayors and city council are mere spectators to the macro trends. If 9/11 never happened, we’d still see improvement in economic development and safety in DC, but not at the torrid pace of the last 13 years.

        • Anonymous

          Nope. City growth is happening outside of DC as well — a function of younger people wanting walkability and amenities.


          • Anonymous

            Yeah, I was going to say if anyone deserves credit it’s L’Enfant for designing an innately walkable streetscape .

          • Anonymous

            Those things are a bonus for sure, but if the jobs weren’t here, it wouldn’t matter how walkable DC was.

          • Anonymous

            indeed. dc was also very walkable when no one wanted to live here.
            hell, so was nyc.

          • Anonymous

            Younger people care more about having a good job than having a walkable city. Ask any of the young college graduates living in their parents’ basement, unable to pay back their student loans. DC being walkable is simply icing on the cake. If DC didn’t have decent jobs, people wouldn’t be here.

      • Anonymous

        every mayor has played a part.
        even barry.

    • Anonymous


    • Anonymous

      He’s not. I wouldn’t say he’s great, but I don’t think he’s done anything bad either. Well, since his campaign at least :).

  • Anonymous

    i have a really silly question, but during Segregation in DC, how did folks that were neither black not white fit into the picture?

    did they go to black schools, or white schools?

    • DCNative

      It’s not a silly question. This is hardly an official answer, but, at least with regard to schools, there were relatively few children who lived in the city who were neither black nor white. DC did not have large numbers of Native American, Latino or Asian children in the school system prior to 1954 — when segregation officially, although not practically — ended. My guess is that non-white embassy kids, for example, probably attended private schools — like Sidwell, in very tiny numbers. My guess is also that race, class, and population density probably criss crossed a bit. Working class non-whites likely attended “colored” schools, while the occasional non-white child of a diplomate may have been able to attend white schools, such as Wilson.
      A related issue is how segregation was handled socially — i.e. where a non-white non-American typically had more access to white facilities than a black American would have — such as Glen Echo Park. I also don’t know how the segregated swimming pools and athletic facilities would have accommodated non-whites. It’s likely that most folks didn’t push the issue too much. If I get a chance, I’ll do a bit of research and come back with a bit more official information.

      • Anonymous

        was there not a decent sized chinese population?

        • Anonymous

          The Asian population was significantly less than 1% through the ’70s. The number of school-age children in DC would have been quite small. I’m fuzzy on this, but I think that immigrants from China skewed adult and male. So there was a very small Chinese population, and it’s likely that only a relatively small part of that population was of school age and attending public schools. Here are some demographic stats from Wikipedia. Note how quickly the percentage of whites decreased after schools were legally desegregated.


        • Anonymous

          The Asian population was significantly less than 1% up through the 1970’s. And immigrants tended to be adult males. So only a small percentage of the already small Chinese population in DC would have been school-age children.

      • Anonymous

        To add to what DC Native said: back in those days the IMF and World Bank established their own private country club (called Bretton Woods, near the Potomac river in MD up from DC). Part of the reason back then was that its well-educated multinational workforce would have trouble obtaining membership at the established country clubs around DC. These were (are) people who would be accustomed to operating in the highest social circles in their countries of origin, and it would have been a shock for them to be excluded in DC due to their skin color/ethnicity. Thus the IMF/WB club was created…

        • tui

          Interesting, I’m an IMF/World Bank kid who grew up a member of Bretton Woods. I do recall my mom telling me they bought McLean vs. NW neighborhoods like Palisades due to discrimination, this was 1972.


Subscribe to our mailing list