Photo by flickr user Orin Zebest

“Dear PoP,

Just saw this article in the Post:

The bright glass-and-copper library on Benning Road NE just beyond the Anacostia River opened last year as an anchor for redevelopment and a refuge for the mind.

Now, District officials are deciding whether they should use the gleaming outpost in a depressed section of the city for another pioneering purpose: as a gateway to online gambling and the promise of millions of dollars in government revenue.

If I am reading this correctly, the DC government is going to set up an online gambling site using public safety infrastructure, then install computer terminals in libraries to allow people to gamble!!!  This was apparently snuck into some bill by Michael Brown.  I can’t imagine a more egregious and horrifying thing for the city government to do and I hope you will spread the word to maybe stop this from happening.

I honestly think this is the most shocking and outrageous idea that council has ever cooked up.”

We spoke about DC launching on line gambling sites here and here.

The Post article also says:

Library officials are considering how to approach the gambling venture. Library spokesman George Williams said the libraries “are looking at everything. We haven’t made a decision yes or no at this moment.”

Michael Brown, the council member who played a central role in advancing gambling in the District, said that it’s not appropriate everywhere. “I would not like to see folks being able to play at a library or a rec center,” he said.

So if it does go live – where, if at all, do you think this gambling should be allowed?


“Dear PoPville,

I wanted to let you and your readers know about a “walk-through” of 11th Street taking place tomorrow which is being hosted by the mayor’s office and a group opposed to Constantine Stavropoulos’s effort to bring a Tryst/Diner/Open City type establishment to 11th Street.

The following message was posted at the 11th Street dog park over the weekend:

“Residents have requested a site walk thru of the 11th street corridor to encourage dialogue and responsible planning of this low-density commercial zone in light of the proposed project, Margot’s Chair coming to their community. Petitions that have circulated through the community have gathered over 200 signatures of residents that are opposed to a business coming to their community of this scale and operating on a 24 hour clock, 7 days a week… Please join us Wednesday 29th at 2:00 pm at 3415 11th street NW. – Francisco Fibres – Office of the Mayor”

It would have been helpful if the mayor’s folks had done a better job getting the word out (I’ve only seen this one sign), and that a time was chosen when most working residents could partake, but as I imagine that is exactly what the opposition group wants. I am confident that the vast majority of neighbors and nearby residents could not be more excited about Margot’s Chair coming to Columbia Heights, the redevelopment of a long vacant eyesore, the much needed jobs the eatery will bring to the area, and the additional security that more eyes on the street will provide. I encourage everyone to contact the Mayor’s office and notify them that a better time needs to selected so that as many people, not just those with an anti-revitalization agenda, can attend. Francisco Fimbres can be contacted at [email protected], (202) 442-8119 or (202) 664-6119″

UPDATE From Francisco Fimbres [confirmed via seperate email from Mr. Fimbres]:

Dear Mr. Krieger:

I am concerned about your messaging to the community. This is not a joint walk-thru or initiative. We are not hosting this meeting. You requested a meeting on site and we agreed to participate. The purpose of our site visit was to listen and observe. Our office is not taking any position on this matter. Your invitation to community stakeholders comes across as, if we are endorsing your position or rallying behind your cause. We are not.

At this time, our office is cancelling our site visit pending further review of your petition.

Best,
Francisco Fimbres



Photo by PoPville Flickr user yostinator

The Caribbean day festival is normally one of my favorite days in DC. I am devastated by what happened late Sat. afternoon. I am also saddened by many of the generalizations made on all sides in the subsequent discussions about the violence. Having said that, the violence itself, particularly the fight on Georgia Ave near Banneker Pool has upset me more than I can properly articulate:

I need the Mayor to comment on this. Say something. Anything. Tell me you saw the clip above. Had I not been sent the clip I wouldn’t have even known it happened. This in the streets of Washington DC. Not just any street but one of our main avenues. Chaos of this magnitude can not be ignored. The Mayor’s silence terrifies me.

I believe the festival is a beautiful event. I’ve gone for many years and during the parade I have never felt an ounce of discomfort or fear of violence. During the parade. It is my deepest hope that this year’s troubles were an aberration. If we abandon the Caribbean Festival I personally believe we will be abandoning a piece of our soul, a piece of who we are. A piece of what makes us such a unique, amazing, and fun place to live. I appreciate that the Festival is not for everyone. That is fine. I’m told many residents in New Orleans actually hate Mardi Gras. But can you imagine New Orleans without Mardi Gras? For me, I can’t imagine Georgia Avenue in the summer without a Caribbean day Festival.

Mr. Mayor, just let me know that you recognize mistakes were made this year and you’ll do everything in your power to make sure they will not be repeated next year. Please.


Photo by PoPville flickr user rjs1322



Photo by PoPville flickr user D©Bloom

“Dear PoPville,

I bought a house with a “garage” built over the car port. I put that in quotes because the thing looks like a chicken coop and I have no idea how it was ever used as a garage. I was going to wait until I could save up to get a new one built before I tore this one down so that I wouldn’t have to go through getting a garage permit (I heard that was possible). The problem I am having is that I have discovered chairs and blankets in there and a friend has seen people smoking in there (they ran away before we could call the police). So my questions are:

1- Do I need a permit to tear down a non-functioning garage over a car port?
2- Does anyone have any recommendations for anyone who can tear down
and haul away the garage?”


“Dear PoPville,

Not being a frequent car driver I don’t know if the signs prohibiting this are new or not, but there a two traffic operations people on foot writing tickets when people turn from H St onto 7th St in Chinatown. It’s nice to see enforcement of traffic rules as it will hopefully encourage better driving and each of the turning cars was heading into pedestrians with a walk signal, but I really hope they didn’t just put up the signs (they look rather new) and put people out to make money off those who hadn’t noticed them yet.”


“Dear PoP,

You posted my reader request about speed bumps a week or so ago…
It generated lots of debate about speed bumps, ambulance routes, and whether 1st NW is a side street or not.

There was just a traffic accident last week, right at the intersection of 1st and N NW, where the cross-walks and ped x-ing signs are that all the drivers ignore.

In the pictures, you can see where a car went over the curb, and through two fences, to hit the side of the condo building. (pictures are of 1st and N NW, looking north.)

Just wondering if people still think the car speeds are acceptable and that the kids crossing every morning don’t deserve some safety, or a four-way stop…”


CM Graham writes in a message titled, Why is DC-HA Tearing down:

Old if not historic apartment building at 11th and Harvard? I know there is a good purpose coming—thye did tell me about that– and of course I know that the DC Housing Authority is highly independent of the DC government (a huge part of the problem)…

But why couldn’t the existing building have been used and preserved? Every time we tear up our historic fabric we must know that it cannot be reclaimed. I bet that building has been standing on that corner for 90 years.

Did DCHA consult with anyone on the demolition? Not me, I can tell you.

I am now asking DCHA Director Todman for an accounting of this. And, also, DCRA Director Majett whether all the demolition permits were in place.

We will be back to you.

We last spoke about this troubled building on June 1st. You can see what the building pre-demo looked like, here.



Photo by PoPville flickr user JosephLeonardo

A reader highly recommends this event for those with kids. From a DPW press release:

DC Government to Hold 4th Annual “Truck Touch” Event Sat., June 11th 2011, from 9 am to 2 pm, at RFK, Lot 7

Come experience the high-tech equipment and vehicles used to provide vital city services. Learn how they operate to serve you better. Kids can climb aboard, work the gears, and honk the horn!

WHAT: District of Columbia Government “Truck Touch” Event

WHEN: Saturday, June 11th, 9 am – 2 pm

WHERE: RFK Stadium, Lot 7 (off of Oklahoma Ave., NE next to the playground)

COST: FREE


“Dear PoP,

I thought you might be interested in my exchange with the DC Taxi Commission regarding a reckless driving incident. Per the Commission, reckless driving by a taxi is not a sanctionable infraction. I am a daily bike commuter, who rides down 11th from Otis every day to work, but taxis’ lack of regard for proper driving standards are a danger for bikers and pedestrian a like. The response from the MPD was “Please raise you complaint with the Taxi Commission”. Seems there is a loophole in reckless driving enforcement for those that are most guilty.”

The following exchange is a bit of a head scratcher:

Good Afternoon,

This will acknowledge receipt of your letter alleging that, the driver of H95628 committed the following act: reckless driving.

While the District of Columbia Taxicab Commission (“Commission”) is deeply concerned about drivers who fail to conduct themselves in an orderly manner or who pose a risk to public safety because of erratic or unsafe acts while operating their vehicle, we can only take disciplinary action against a driver for conduct that is in violation of the rules set forth in Title 31 of the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations (“Taxicabs and Public Vehicles for Hire”). Unfortunately, the conduct that you describe does not constitute a violation of those rules.

You should know that we are in the process of developing a partnership with the Metropolitan Police Department which will allow us to handle complaints that involve traffic offenses.

We will, however, keep a record of this complaint and a copy of the driver’s response, if any, in his file and it will be reviewed along with any other complaints involving this driver and will be taken into consideration in advance of any request by the driver to renew or extend his privilege to operate a taxicab in the District of Columbia.

Thank you for taking the time to contact us about this incident. Your continued vigilance provides us with invaluable assistance as we strive to improve the standards associated with driver training and customer service

DC Taxicab Commission

and

Thank you for your response. To be clear, you are stating that “reckless driving” is not a violation of the Commission’s rules? I read Title 31 and it appears to be a framework law setting out the requirements and paramaters for establishing and governing the Commission. It DOES NOT specify rules of the road for taxi drivers. These should the same for all drivers, i.e. the DMV’s regulations. Para 701.8 states a complaint must comprise a violation of the “Commission’s Rules and Regulations”. These are not defined in Title 31 so please sent them to me. I would amazed if “reckless driving” is omitted, and if it is the loop-hole should be closed.
However, para 1013.2 states that complaints can consist of “violations of the Commission’s regulations” OR “violations of the Department of Motor Vehicles’ regulations”, which would include a prohibition against reckless driving. This section would lead me to believe that reckless driving is a violation of Title 31 directly.

In short, either the Commission or the Metropolitan Police Department needs to enforce safe driving practices by taxis. Please respond in detail as I will not let this matter drop. DC taxis tend to be a hazard to DC residents, especially bikers: they do not use signals, they drive while on the phone, they do not pull over but stop where it pleases them, they do not respect bike lanes, etc.



Photo by PoPville flickr user Suse_dc

Every year people ask about the legality of fireworks in DC so I just wanted to share a note from DCRA:

As the July 4th holiday approaches get all the required permits, licenses, and inspections for you to legally set up a fireworks stand and sell fireworks. Use or the possession of illegal fireworks in the District of Columbia could face fines and penalties of up to $2,000 and/or arrest for further prosecution.

Permits, certificate of occupancy, FEMS application, and Basic business license are required to legally operate a fireworks sales stand in the District of Columbia.

The deadline for submitting applications to DCRA is June 20, 2011


View More Stories