A reader wrote in suggesting this property in Eckington be nominated for this week’s horse’s ass award. The work this reader put together is incredible. He compiled all of his research in PDF format here:  329 Rhode Island Ave NE

The reader writes:

“My Eckington neighbors and I have been battling the owner of 329 Rhode Island Ave NE (a 6 story boarded up building that has stood vacant for 12+ years). It’s been on a “watchlist” since 2000 (http://www.dcwatch. com/mayor/ 000314.htm). Last year, it magically caught fire a day after it was placed on the tax sale list, and burned for 3 days since the firecrews couldn’t extinguish the tar roof. You also featured video of the blaze on your website… And now the building owner has collected his insurance money, but the building still languishes and the owner gets even more exemptions from vacant and blighted property taxes.

DCRA has been unwavering in their dedication to giving exemption after exemption to the building owner, since he always says he’s trying to renovate it, or sell it. However no work is ever done on the building, and there certainly isn’t any MLS listing the building as “for sale.”

Continues after the jump. (more…)


“Dear PoP,

I have noticed a surge in graffiti activity in Columbia Heights over the past few weeks, but one takes a particularly long pause when it happens to your own property. Please see my crude photo documentation of the most recent tag “GA” along Girard between 11th and 14th. How annoying is this? Councilman Graham has been quick to respond. I think it’s fair to say it needs to be removed. How about preventing CH from turning into a late 1970’s NYC subway mural. CH has seen clear and present growth with respect to pride in ownership. The littering must stop, the graffiti must stop!”

More examples here – CH Girard artwork



Petworth’s Safeway on Georgia Ave (3830 Georgia Ave, NW)


Georgetown’s new Safeway on Wisconsin Ave (1855 Wisconsin Ave, NW)

While I’m very happy with the YES! Organic Market a bit further up the block at Georgia and Taylor, I find it pretty appalling to compare the Petworth Safeway to the Georgetown Safeway. I understand that Georgetown residents have a lot of money to spend so obviously they are going to get a nice store but Petworth residents were told time and time again that this relic on Georgia Ave was going to be upgraded. Whenever I ask Mayor Fenty or Council Member Bowser they say, plans are still in the works. But Lord – how long must we wait. Quite frankly I just don’t like all the bullshit. If they’re not going to upgrade the Georgia Ave Safeway then just say so. Be honest with us, we can take it. I’ve heard lots of rumors as to why the Safeway upgrade has stalled. Some blame residents, some blame Safeway, some blame funding/tax break issues. But are we not entitled to an honest answer?

So once and for all – should the Georgia Ave Safeway be upgraded? If so, what is the responsibility of Safeway, our elected leaders and/or the residents to make sure this happens.  I believe that Mt. Vernon Square (City Vista), Adams Morgan, Georgetown, Navy Yard (SW Waterfront) all have new or upgraded stores.  Besides Petworth what other neighborhoods do you think are due for an upgrade?

I can tell you when I walked into the Georgia Ave store this weekend I was hit with a foul odor. When I walked into the Wisconsin Ave store, I could swear that the aisles were paved with gold. Not to speak for all but I’d be happy with half as nice an upgrade in Petworth.

Luncheon meats at Georgia Ave above.

A portion of the cheese selection at Wisconsin Ave below.



Photo by PoPville flickr user Madame Meow

Ugh, this is frustrating. I know it’s not bike related but perhaps DDOT could take a second to look into this…

“Dear PoP,

Have you fielded any complaints from DC drivers regarding “self-correcting” parking meters? These are meters that may initially accept coins but then display an “out of order” message, and thereafter stop registering the deposit of additional coins. Drivers are left with the choice of finding new parking spaces or calling in the meters as broken. If a driver decides to call in the meter as broken, and leave, even for 10 minutes, the driver faces the risk that the parking meter will “self-correct” during his/her absence. “Self-correcting” means that a parking meter resets itself, showing “00:00”, as if no money had ever been deposited. According to a recent Washington Examiner article, 74 percent of the City’s meters are designed to “self-correct.” Here is the rub. The City’s meter enforcement officials ticket cars at meters that have self-corrected; to them, the cars appear to have been parked at functioning meters and that their drivers have not deposited the any money.

In my particular case, I deposited 75 cents at a meter outside Whole Foods on P St., NW. The meter then displayed out of order. I called the meter in as broken, was given a confirmation number by the City, and was told I could park at the broken meter for up to two hours. Returning to my car 15 minutes later, I found a $25 ticket. I appealed the $25 fine and the City rejected it, on the grounds that the City had checked for “complaints, outages or repairs during the time period the violation occurred” and had found none. In order to appeal that decision, DC regulations required that I pay the $25 fine and a $10 appeal fee. Last night I received a letter stating my payment was an admission of guilt and the City considers the case closed. I guess the City is now $35 closer to closing its several hundred million dollar budget gap…”



Photo by PoPville flickr user KJinDC

“Dear PoP,

Last week, as I ran through the rain with a stroller and no umbrella, I stopped under the awning of The Park at 14th to wait for the light to change. Two workers from The Park – a man and a woman, of whom I’m very sad I didn’t find out the names – popped out and offered me an umbrella. The umbrella was nice and large enough to cover both me and my daughter in her stroller. I couldn’t believe how generous and thoughtful two strangers could be. The people in this city utterly amaze me sometimes and I really hope a restaurant/club with such nice people working at it is successful. My husband and I are scheduling a date night there very soon!”



Photo by PoPville flickr user Wayan Vota

This is so wild at first I thought it was a hoax. From a CM Jim Graham press release:

Today, Council Member Jim Graham released the following statement on Google’s revelation that it has been collecting data from open wi-fi networks as part of its “Street Views” mapping system.

“This is a shocking revelation that may have exposed countless Washingtonians to a “big brother-like” invasion of privacy,” Council Member Graham said.

“In this digital age, it is essential that government take a strong stand to protect its citizens from the unwanted erosion of privacy by large corporations. Should we discover that laws have been violated, we must act swiftly to enforce those laws to the fullest extent.”

Google has been sending cars with cameras down streets for the past four years capturing images for its street view maps. Late Friday, May 14, Google announced they had collected data from unprotected wi-fi networks in homes that their street-view-camera cars drove by. This means Google could have intercepted any activity on those wi-fi networks, including emails sent, documents/photos downloaded, instant messages exchanged, websites visited, etc.

Graham has asked Attorney General Peter Nickles and Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs Director Linda Argo to investigate any anti-trust violations of the D.C. Code (28 D.C. Code 3903(a)(1)) relating to the city’s privacy laws and whether this constitutes a pattern or practice of abuse. He has also asked Attorney General Nickles whether the communications privacy issue is something that the District could pursue, or whether it is primarily a federal matter.



Photo from PoPville flickr user caroline.angelo

“Dear PoP,

I have a question that hopefully either you or the readers might be able to answer.

I live in a row of townhouses whose main floors face the backyards of other townhouses. This past Saturday, one of those townhouses brought out a radio and started blasting it directly at us around 7am. This continued throughout the day until about 11pm. At one point, there were about 20 people on their 2nd level deck, and at many times, no one was outside. I understand that it was a gorgeous day on Saturday and that people want to have music outside to enjoy a gathering, but I find this a little excessive. We couldn’t go anywhere in our house without hearing it, and our neighbors were upset as well, since some have young children and the boombox was pointed directly at us, from about 60ft away.

I’m 29 and so I’m not an old person that thinks everything should be quiet all day even though I moved to a populated area. Polite requests from us went unheeded, as we were told to f*** off when we simply asked for the music to be turned down a little. Is there any other recourse we could take? Police wouldn’t even come to my complex when I was reporting a bicycle theft in progress, so I doubt they would care about excessive noise. I don’t even think a law was being broken- just neighborly courtesy. I believe these are new tenants to that townhouse and I cannot imagine going through this every nice weekend throughout the summer.”

We’ve spoken about noise issues a number of times. At one time I wrote:

I think neighbor disputes are among the most difficult to deal with. It’s like the rational actor model. If you are not dealing with a rational actor it seems most people in these situations are screwed. It seems to me if you have had (a polite) conversation with your neighbors but they continue to persist in loud activities then you are left no other choice but to call the police.

Now this reader writes that they are afraid the police will not respond. The police must respond if called. They don’t have a choice to decide what call is important or not. Obviously if there is a major/violent crime units will be diverted. But in a normal situation, if there is a noise violation call they must respond. There are decibel levels that can not be exceeded. If necessary those levels can be enforced.

Having said that, I think calling the police should be a last case scenario. In this situation a polite request did not work. But sometimes psychological tactics should be employed. For instance since talking didn’t work while they had many guests over, maybe you would have better luck bringing it up again in a one on one scenario so nobody has to lose face in front of others. Perhaps they didn’t want to look bad in front of their friends by turning the music down. Perhaps you can talk to a respected long term resident from the block and have them intervene. If all those efforts don’t work, then by all means you should call the cops.

Now I have no doubt that there will be many calls for you to move to Fairfax, Iowa, etc. etc. In my opinion that way oversimplifies the situation. Yes, when you live in a city you are likely to hear city noises. And it can be loud at times. Though, to me, blasting music from 7am until 11pm is unacceptable. I’m not saying you should move to an apartment above a bar and then complain of loud music. However, if you live in a residential area you should be entitled to some modicum of peace.

In this case I strongly believe it will be helpful to talk directly or have a surrogate talk with the offending neighbor after the fact when tempers have calmed. Perhaps it was just a graduation party?

If talking doesn’t resolve the situation and you call the police in the future and they refuse to come please send me an email.



Photo by PoPville flickr user K’s Clicks

“Dear PoP,

I need your help and all of the readers of PoP. I am considering moving to the Hill East/ Stadium-Armory area, and wanted to know what type of area it is–is there any new development coming that way, what makes it different than other areas in D.C.,and what do people actually reside in the area now think of it? The more feedback the better because I know very little about the area, and want to be as knowledgeable about it before I make the move.”

Well there is definitely development going on. You have a pretty new Harris Teeter in Jenkins Row at 1350 Potomac Avenue SE. There is the popular Wisdom (and Trustys) bar. We had a discussion about this area in a GDoN post where the home was next to Mangialardo sandwich shop. Here’s some more general advice about the Hill.

What advice would you guys give about this area?



Photo by PoPville flickr user Tyrannous

The following was written by PoP contributor Eric Nuzum. You can read Eric’s previous contributions here.

Like Haley Joel Osment in The Sixth Sense–I have a mildly embarrassing confession to make. But unlike him, I don’t see dead people.

I see naked people.

And I don’t know what to do about it.

When we moved into our rowhouse in Petworth in early 2008, the four-unit apartment building behind us only had one tenant. It was a guy, living alone. He kept to himself and didn’t seem to have a lot of friends or visitors. If it wasn’t for the occasional light on in the evening, you would think the whole building was empty. Eventually, he left to, and the building was completely vacant.

We’d heard from a neighbor that the building’s owner was somewhere in the vicinity of a thousand-years-old. Due to his ancientness, he didn’t have the time or energy to find new tenants. So the building just sat there empty with a for sale sign in front of it.

Unlike other vacant properties, it really wasn’t a problem. With the exception of someone once emptying a semi-automatic weapon into the air on the night of the Super Tuesday elections (no connection that I’m aware of), life in the alley that separates the empty building from us has been relatively quiet and uneventful. No intruders, no animals–just a big empty building seen from every back window in our house.

Then, one day this spring, the for sale sign was gone. Then we noticed some construction debris by the trash cans. Then, almost overnight, there were new tenants living in every unit. Lights on. People coming and going. Suddenly, the place was back to life.

Two days later, I was sitting in rocking chair calming my unhappy and awake newborn son, when I looked out the nursery window and saw the nude torso of the woman in the lower left unit. This wasn’t a passing thing either. She was standing right in front of the window, wearing only a pair of panties (well, she could have been wearing kneesocks and army boots, but you get the picture), lightly scratching her stomach.

I can understand how this happens. Though alleys are supposed to be more dangerous than the streets, when it’s your alley, you can easily get lured into a false sense of privacy and seclusion. All these residents have blinds and/or shades on their windows, but especially on warm evenings, don’t feel compelled to be all that militant about using them.

It was only two days until I saw my next exposed neighbor. I guy was coming back from a shower, dripping wet and wrapped in a towel, when he decided to remove the towel and bend over–thus mooning me while I was trying to change my son’s diaper.

When I was eleven-years-old, I was the same as every eleven-year-old boy: I was obsessed with naked people. My friends and I would steal copies of Playboy out of trash cans and sit and stare at naked bodies for hours. We treated these worn pages like holy relics. Now, as an adult, seeing strangers naked, especially those who I see clothed several hours later, is not something I seek out. No offense, but if I was in the mood to see naked people, it wouldn’t be them.

And it has continued. In fact, without ever actually wanting to, I have unintentionally seen a resident in all four apartments in some state of undress. Sometimes it seems like a colony of nudists has moved into the building in mass. The torso woman has repeated her naked scratching in front of the window on two other occasions. Last weekend I witnessed her next door neighbors fornicating in front of an open window at 4 a.m. (hey, kids wake up all the time).

At first, I was really embarrassed. I would close my window shades at the sight of a naked renter. But why should I be the one who needs to avoid looking out the window? Isn’t that like some kind of inalienable right or something?

Now, the question I pose to you, wise reader: What should I do? Should I say anything? Is this something worth caring about? (It apparently isn’t that big an issue to the tenants.)

At first I was tempted to leave anonymous notes saying, “When you stand naked in front of an open window, people can see your boobies.” But then I realized that since my house was the one directly behind their building, that they’d immediately suspect me.

Now I’m at a loss.

I feel I should be able to keep my window shades open without feeling like a creep or a prude.

What do you think? Should I say something when I see something?



Photo courtesy of Save Screen on the Green Facebook page.

From a press release:

Screen on the Green Will Not Return for 11th Summer without Additional Sponsorship

WASHINGTON – May 4, 2010 – The always-popular summer favorite, Screen on the Green, is in jeopardy again, unless additional funding can be secured.

Longtime Screen on the Green producer HBO and sponsor Comcast are willing to continue their support of this annual event, but have indicated that it cannot take place without an additional $75,000 – $100,000 contribution.

Screen on the Green has faced funding troubles in the past.  In 2009, it was almost discontinued when HBO decided not to continue its sponsorship. Washingtonians organized a Facebook and letter writing campaign, resulting in Comcast and the Trust for the National Mall stepping in alongside HBO to allow Screen on the Green to return for its 10th anniversary.

Screen on the Green is a remarkable free summer movie series that provides a tribute to classic films. The screenings are shown on the National Mall and attract approximately 15,000 Washingtonians and tourists during each screening, held on Monday nights from mid-July through late August, making this one of the largest community events in the District of Columbia. Past film selections include Casablanca, Rocky, On the Waterfront and Dr. No. Washington City Paper readers voted Screen on the Green first runner-up for “Best Festival” in 2009.

The effort to “Save Screen on the Green” continues this spring online, as the profile for the Facebook fan page builds at  http://www.facebook.com/savescreenonthegreen. “Save Screen on the Green” is a committee of Washingtonians and avid Screen on the Green fans who have partnered with D.C. Film Alliance to explore options to secure additional sponsors. More information is available on www.SaveScreenOnTheGreen.org. Additionally, visitors can donate funds or register to receive email updates.


View More Stories