Click image to enlarge

Dear PoPville,

For a few years now, the Dorchester House (at 16th and Kalorama) has been undergoing renovations and policy changes. Most recently, the building and it’s management company decided that residents who were entering or exiting the building with their bicycles were required to use only the basement or side entrance and were prohibited from using the main lobby entrance. Their reasoning is that bicycles are allegedly messing up their new carpet (even though many, many more dirty feet come trekking through that lobby).

They have also indicated that anyone caught violating this policy would first receive a written warning, followed by a $200 fine and (on a third offense) eviction.

My question: Is this a legal, “reasonable policy” change and has anyone else ever experienced this type of restriction on residents with bicycles?


From a press release:

Over the past several months, Metro staff conducted a “census” of bicycles parked at Metrorail stations for planning purposes. As part of that process, Metro staff identified and photographed more than two dozen potentially abandoned bikes throughout the system. In many cases, these bikes had flat tires, missing parts or rusted frames.

To make space available for bicycle customers and to discourage theft, Metro Transit Police will soon begin a process to tag and remove these bicycles. From the time the bike is tagged, owners will have ten days to remove it.

Today, Metro is releasing a photo directory of the potentially abandoned bikes. Owners are encouraged to remove them from bike racks as soon as possible. Abandoned bikes that remain unclaimed may be sent to auction.

See Photo directory in PDF below:

Abandoned Bike Summary


From a press release:

City Bikes, a local independent bicycle retailer with locations in DC’s Adams Morgan and Capitol Hill neighborhoods as well as in Chevy Chase, Maryland suffered a tragic loss this past Wednesday, July 25th. CEO Debora Harding’s son Kadian was killed while riding his bicycle with his father Thomas Harding near their home in the United Kingdom when he was struck head-on by a Sprinter van. He was 14 years old.

The City Bikes family, along with the DC cycling community, will ride in Kadian’s honor this Sunday, July 29th at 7pm from the flagship location at 2501 Champlain Street NW in Adams
Morgan
. Following the ride at 8:30pm, there will be a candlelight vigil at Unity Park across the street from City Bikes in Adams Morgan.

Kadian Harding was an avid cyclist and lover of technology. He lent a hand at his mother’s bike shop during his school vacations for years, always wanting to help out with IT needs. At the time of his death, Kadian was preparing to install a network of almost 30 new computers at all three of City Bikes’ locations. Being a lover of all things Apple, Kadian was very excited to have been offered an opportunity to train at the Apple Business Center in the coming months.

Kadian will be remembered as a brilliant, articulate, and kind young man. His oft-occurring smile can still be felt within the walls of all three City Bikes shops, especially the Capitol Hill location, which Kadian helped to build.

The ride will first visit Georgetown and DC’s only Apple retail store, then on around the monuments to City Bikes’ Capitol Hill shop on Barracks Row. The ride will end back in Adams Morgan at Unity Park, across the street from City Bikes, for the candlelight vigil.

In order to best honor Kadian’s memory, the use of helmets and lights will be required. Additionally, all participants will be required to follow the standard rules of the road and follow the directions of the ride marshals at all times.

Details can be found at facebook.com/CityBikesDC.



Photo by PoPville flickr user jennverr

Dear PoPville,

I wanted to get your readers’ thoughts on how they would handle the run-in I had last night with potential bike thieves.

I was walking home from the Metro around 11:30pm last night after the Nats game. My boyfriend and I were walking up 14th St. on the West side of the street toward our apartment when we saw — actually, first we heard it — a man hammering (with an actual hammer, loudly) the u-lock of a bike locked in front of Pan Lourdes, across the street from us. He wasn’t alone — another man was alternately helping him and, it seemed, keeping a look out. There were others around us, and while everyone turned their heads at the sound and looked perplexed as to why someone would be hammering a bike lock open, no one did anything.

After my boyfriend tried to draw attention to the men, thinking they would stop what they were doing or at least explain that it was their bike they were taking, with no success, I did the only thing I could think of that was safe — called 911. As I was on the phone describing the men and what they were doing to the operator, they looked over at me and seemed to get what I was doing — but still didn’t say anything, they just stared at us.

We walked down the street a block, and sure enough a policeman pulled up beside them (shout out to the MPD for their quick reaction time!). We were too far away to see what happened after that, but we didn’t see anyone fleeing and there seemed to be no violence or shouting.

I’m curious about whether people think our reaction — calling the emergency line, in plain sight of the possible perps, on a couple of guys who may have just been retrieving their bike to which they lost the key — was appropriate or not. In the moment and in retrospect, our justifications were: 1) it was suspicious that this was happening at 11:30pm, 2) they unconcealed way they were doing it seemed to be a coverup, 3) no one else was doing a thing, which seemed irresponsible to us, and 4) I had a bike stolen from that same location 2 years ago and I wanted to do everything in my power to stop that from happening to another person, even if it meant calling the cops on innocent men.



Photo by PoPville flickr user johnmcochran2012

Dear PoPville,

We live in a small building (about 20 units) between Adams Morgan and U Street. The landlord was very nice to us when we moved in and takes real pride in his units, which are being 100% renovated as tenants move out (ours is completely brand new). Our rent is very reasonable for the area, space, and amenities (brand new appliances, working wood fireplace, etc.) and we like living there.

However, our landlord does not allow bikes in the building (he says they have damaged walls/hallway fixtures in the past and is tired of dealing with it) and recently posted a sign saying that all apartments would be subject to routine inspection tomorrow. Someone will enter our apartment from 9:30-12:30. There is no reason listed on the sign for the inspection.

We have read our lease and there is a clause the the landlord can enter units during an emergency to do inspection and can do regular inspections when giving notice. This seems standard for a lease, but I suppose that we’ve never actually seen this acted upon outside of situations that call for it–broken pipes, etc. What could he hope to gain other than making all of his residents feel like residents of a live-in prison?


A reader just sends word that a cab hit a cyclist at the corner of 15th and T St, NW. They did not mention how badly the cyclist was injured.

@DCPoliceDept tweets:

“(1/2) Traffic Alert: Accident involving a cyclist at 15th and T St, NW. Northbound traffic on 15th St is shut down until further notice.

(2/2) PT is an adult male;he’s going in &out of consciousness/taken to a local hospital. Take EB Swann St,14th St and 16th St/7066”


View More Stories