“Oh, you shouldn’t do that,” she remarked.
After repeatedly saying that, no, I didn’t have a problem, she stopped me to say:
“No, what I mean is that when you patronize those places, you are supporting them and all the things that come along with them.”
She then listed off a litany of issues: serving the obviously intoxicated, loitering, drug activity, petty crime–all things that she felt gravitated around the liquor store. Her logic: get rid of the store, get rid of the problem. If you can’t get rid of the store, at least don’t shop there.
I had a different view. I think its naive to think that all those problems “go away” if a store isn’t there. All those things will still happen, just perhaps not in that location. So, if that’s the case, why would patronizing it make any difference?
Therefore, shopping at said liquor store is not a tacet endorsement of all those horrible things she mentioned.
What do you think? Who is right? Or, more than likely, is neither of us right?
Photo by DCbmyers You can talk about whatever is on your mind – quality of life issues, a beautiful tree you spotted, scuttlebutt, or any random questions/thoughts you may have….
“Dear PoPville, DC Health is holding a community meeting on Thursday, 8/18, to discuss the “rat crisis” in the Logan Circle neighborhood (specifically, the block between 14th and 15th streets…
Thanks to Sue for sending from Logan Circle. Sweet City Ride is made possible by readers like you! Email your finds to [email protected]
photo by Erin “Dear PoPville, I was in the northwest corner of Banneker Sunday afternoon, he asked about the book I was reading and shared about his, The Far Land….