“Aluminum signs that were temporarily installed in some DC ambulances are being removed”

Photo via @ChehPress

More on the recent ambulance problems from the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and Justice:

“Aluminum signs that were temporarily installed in some D.C. Fire and Emergency Services (FEMS) ambulances are being removed from the vehicles, Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and Justice Paul Quander said.

When FEMS ambulances were brought in for service last month because of air conditioning failures caused by the heatwave, aluminum signs were placed in the engine compartments of some of the vehicles to serve temporarily as heat shields. An official from the International Association of Fire Fighters Local 36 informed a FEMS official of this on Monday, Aug. 12. “But the official that it was brought to did not take immediate action,” Deputy Mayor Quander said.

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) was asked late Tuesday to investigate two reports of fires in ambulances earlier that day. Police were made aware of the aluminum sign situation, and MPD said late Wednesday that it does not appear that either of the ambulances involved had these signs in their engine compartments.

“One of the reasons we wanted MPD is to get independent eyes and ears involved,” Quander said.

As of late Wednesday, four ambulances had been found to have these alterations, and two of them were already back in service after the alterations were removed and new aluminum safely installed.”

5 Comment

  • I can’t make sense of this as written. The signs were installed at heat shields in response to what? The broken ACs? or was this totally unrelated? And this issue is unrelated to the recent fires? So… the problem is that they made a temporary fix that caused no known problems?

  • Fire whoever put it there…. problem solved.

  • There were questions when the 2 ambulances caught on fire:

    1. did using signs as heat shields cause the fires?
    2. did firefighters put the signs in themselves to make FEMS look incompetent, or was this actually something FEMS management wanted repair workers to do instead of a real repair?

    The article answers #2, but not #1.

Comments are closed.