Comments on: Update on Chocolate City Beer Coming to Brookland/Edgewood Border

By: Louiedelphonic

Louiedelphonic — Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:42:32 +0000

Lol, Regardless it’s about beer and damn good beer at that!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:18:19 +0000

Brookland Basques

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:17:24 +0000

Yep. They have a Basque.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:15:03 +0000

Ok, he’s Basque.

By: Louiedelphonic

Louiedelphonic — Sat, 04 Dec 2010 03:17:59 +0000

That is NOT a “White Guy”, he is American and definitly not cool to judge or assume that a person is a “White Guy” because he or she has a caucasion complexion. I actually know that young man and he is not what you call a “White Guy”, But a “Nice Guy” who is part of a great idea and company named, Chocolate City Beer and might I add is a very clever name, get over it! I think the word your looking for is Envy..

By: Louiedelphonic

Louiedelphonic — Sat, 04 Dec 2010 02:59:41 +0000

Typo in message “helps” should be “Helped”

By: Louiedelphonic

Louiedelphonic — Sat, 04 Dec 2010 02:58:34 +0000

I agree that there is no problem with the name. The name is a great fit, and for anyone who enjoys watching the REDskins play football shouldn’t have a negative comment regarding chocolate city beer. Because we all know the REDskins helps the “white man” for what? So they can get run out of town and have a NFL team named in honor of that great cause. Seriously, its a great name and I hope they do well! It is 2010 we need to get off of the racism and color ish, we need to grow and move forward not backwards!

Sincerely,

Family.

By: Rrrrrrrr

Rrrrrrrr — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:05:33 +0000

i love the name; just like i love the idea of a White Boy Stout; or a Thug Life Lager; I’m also disapointed Obama did not check ‘mixed race’ on his cencus form (he still is half-half, despite his moving to choc city, no?)

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:09:18 +0000

No, Landover Snyderskins

By: IMGoph

IMGoph — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:00:02 +0000

from what i’ve understood, this property and others to the north of it refused to give the MBT an easement to continue the trail north of franklin, which is why it goes on street here. i’m assuming that ownership was before these guys.